html - Marking up the "BBC pattern" in HTML5 -

-

i'm looking @ bbc site, , putting following similar overall pattern, , determining how mark appropriately stumping me somewhat.

the bbc consists of several considered sites in own right:

(these subdomains instead - indeed, case me - urls not important)

each of these self-contained, own content, menu , , feel. of them tied use of (slightly variable mostly) static header bar. contains header "bbc" along links of various sub-sites.

so question is, how should marked up. see several different options:

  1. the main bbc header site's main <header> , <nav>. sort of correct, because ends de-emphasising importance of sub-site's actual content. when boils down (to use examples above), title "comedy" , associated menu main content of page, not bbc bar.

  2. make sub-sites' header , navigation ones marked within <header> , <nav>. feels better, opens question bbc bar is? option use <aside>, contains own <header> , <nav>. far know, fine header having other <nav> element still weird. better option above?

  3. do same number 1 (bbc bar has main <header> , <nav>), mark rest of page inside <article> element. spec indicates article element used items make sense on own, case here. , it'll make sense have own <header> (and <nav>? pushing somewhat?) seems stretching definition of 'article' rather further dictionary definition allows.

to me, having given thought , thrown ideas , forth on twitter, number 2 seems best of these options. idea of putting contents of <aside> top element on page (visually , in markup, since seems make logical sense way) doesn't quite sit right me.

am overlooking obvious solution or usual enough pattern make difficult seems? , surely can't 1 puzzle on this?

thanks thoughts.

the main header should be, pointed out, marked in <header> , <nav>.

i mark each additional page content in <article> containing it's own <header> , <nav>. ignore dictionary definition of article, doesn't apply here. it's fine have more 1 <nav> element on page, long contents navigate within site, makes sense.

putting top header in <aside> doesn't seem correct me content isn't stand alone.

just thoughts on subject!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cursor error with postgresql, pgpool and php -

-
hey, struggling bit determine exact cause of error has been popping in our release environment. there not seem dealing particular error on google. this error message getting: sqlstate[34000]: invalid cursor name: 7 error: portal "" not exist the error pops when using pdo prepared statements. this setup our release environment: pgpool 3.0.1 (the postgresql backend in streaming replication mode!) php 5.3.5 postgresql 9.0 edit: architecture 64bit. the same error not manifest in our test environment (edit: forgot mention, standard test environment uses postgresql 9.0 without pgpool). thus, led suspect pgpool @ least partly suspect. does know probable causes error are? edit: ok, here example of kind of code causes error. $sql = 'select * '; $sql .= 'from "mytable" "mystuff" '; $sql .= 'where "mytable"."status" = 1 '; $sql .= 'and "mytable"."mytableid" = :table...
Read more

delphi - ESC/P programming! -

-
why need use because printers using tprinter prints weird hieroglyph @ beginning of printable area. my problem if send commands, nothing happens. esc e (#27 #69) - sending escape sequence didn't work expected. removed first letter , rest of string made bold. eg. hello -> ello . after changed esc e esc (#27 #69 #27), worked fine. example managed figure out, but... trying select character table "esc t n" (#27 #116 n), make "õäöü" work. command doesn't work. nothing happens! , command supported esc/p, esc/p 2 , 9-pin esc/p, should work fine. manual can found here . if has ever needed use esc/p commands maybe 1 can shed light how work them! thanks in advance! edit: in previous post asked more or less same question though answers how did send commands printer. (i'll change question there according answers!) i accepted ken's answer, because claimed way transferred commands wasn't best , got work escape command. problem after t...
Read more

c++ - error: use of deleted function -

-
i've been working on c++ code friend has written , following error have never seen before when compiling gcc4.6: error: use of deleted function ‘gamefsm_<std::array<c, 2ul> >::hdealt::hdealt()’ implicitly deleted because default definition ill-formed: uninitialized non-static const member ‘const h_t floppokergamefsm_<std::array<c, 2ul> >::hdealt::h’ edit: comes part of code using boost msm: boost webpage edit2: there no = delete() used anywhere in sourcecode. generally speaking, error mean? should looking when type of error occurs? i don't think other answers mentioning =deleted; syntax correct. error message says default constructor has been deleted implicitly . says why: class contains non-static, const variable, not initialized default ctor. class x { const int x; }; since x::x const , must initialized -- default ctor wouldn't initialize (because it's pod type). therefore, default ctor, need define 1 (and must ...
Read more